Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Viktor Durasovic vs Sebastian Fanselow Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Durasovic vs Fanselow analysis and find out who is favored!
Viktor Durasovic vs Sebastian Fanselow Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Durasovic 1 - 0 Fanselow
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Durasovic has won 51.25% of points on his second serve, while Fanselow has won 49.17%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Durasovic, in recent form, has won 52.39% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fanselow has won 50.58%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.53% and 30.45% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Durasovic has saved 56.82% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fanselow has saved 59.66% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Durasovic has won 48.44% of matches played (W/L 31/ 33), with Fanselow winning 60.92% (W/L 53/ 34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Durasovic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 166/ 98), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Fanselow has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 204/ 118), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 33/ 30).
- Player level: In the last year, Durasovic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 44.12% of matches (W/L 15/ 19), where as Fanselow has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 76.19% of matches (W/L 32/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Durasovic winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Durasovic winning 2 and Fanselow winning 1. The last match between Durasovic and Fanselow was at the M25 Bourg-en-Bresse, 30-06-2021, First, Clay with Viktor Durasovic getting the victory 1-6 7-6(1) 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:16:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Durasovic and Fanselow have played a deciding set 1 times, with Durasovic winning 1 times and Fanselow 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Durasovic winning 1, and Fanselow 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Durasovic has played against opponents with an average rank of 240.05 while Fanselow has played against players with an average rank of 237.23.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Durasovic has won 46% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fanselow has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Durasovic has converted 41.32% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fanselow has converted 35.34% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
502
Rank
298
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
313
Rank
273
High
32
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
54% (346-297)
Career Total W/L
60% (355-233)
55% (21-17)
YTD W/L
50% (18-18)
$14,785
Career Prize Money
$3,105
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Viktor Durasovic | Sebastian Fanselow |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 14 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:16:0 | 1:16:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (36/54) | 52% (23/44) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (23/36) | 87% (20/23) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 33% (6/18) | 43% (9/21) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 33% (3/9) |
| Return Points W% | 34% (15/44) | 46% (25/54) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-6 7-6(1) 6-2 |
Stats 
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
87%
(
20 of
23)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
46%
(
25 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
15 of
44)
44
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Viktor Durasovic | Sebastian Fanselow |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 55% (21/17) | 50% (18/18) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (49/41) | 48% (39/43) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (446/425) | 49% (394/413) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (8/4) | 47% (7/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 44% (7/9) | 38% (3/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (6/4) | 62% (8/5) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.36 | 0.38 |
| Aces Total | 154 | 149 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.26 |
| DFs Total | 101 | 103 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:32 | 1:45:16 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 229.5 | 237.81 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (1572/2692) | 58% (1417/2442) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (1066/1572) | 70% (993/1417) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (574/1120) | 49% (504/1025) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (119/288) | 35% (88/249) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (1133/2761) | 38% (961/2526) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 33% (1/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (6/6) | 46% (11/13) |
| Futures W/L | 58% (14/10) | 67% (6/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (21/38) | 49% (17/35) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (6/12) | 44% (7/16) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (7/14) | 64% (7/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 84% (19/16) | 94% (16/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 16% (19/3) | 6% (16/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 26% (19/5) | 15% (20/3) |
Viktor Durasovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Parizzia
Player
Viktor Durasovic
65%
(
60 of
92)
1st Serve %
58%
(
69 of
119)
11
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
42 of
69)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
35 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
49 of
119)
106
Total Points Won
105
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Filip Cristian Jianu
Player
Viktor Durasovic
77%
(
75 of
97)
1st Serve %
63%
(
63 of
100)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
7
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
39 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
100)
105
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(0) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Sebastian Eriksson
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Henrik Bladelius
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
46%
(
27 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
Viktor Durasovic
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
55%
(
40 of
73)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
45%
(
39 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Matija Pecotic
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
52%
(
53 of
102)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
102)
105
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
53%
(
47 of
88)
1st Serve %
68%
(
72 of
106)
10
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
106)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ajeet Rai
Player
Viktor Durasovic
65%
(
60 of
93)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
93)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
36 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kaylan Bigun
Player
Viktor Durasovic
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kaylan Bigun
Player
Viktor Durasovic
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Sebastian Fanselow Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yoshihito Nishioka
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
92%
(
11 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Thiago Agustin Tirante
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
70%
(
64 of
92)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
39 of
64)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
89
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Lucas Gerch
54%
(
47 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
48%
(
42 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
44 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Luca Castagnola
43%
(
41 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
106)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
9
88%
(
36 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
106)
108
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexis Galarneau
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
15
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Durasovic Vs Fanselow Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
